C1T4L6 · Revised 2026-10-26

Decision and objectives

Practical task: Read a hypothetical protected or guaranteed fund term sheet

Objectives: Distinguish best-efforts protection from a guarantee; Reconstruct a dated contingent payoff; Compare early-sale value with scheduled-maturity rights.

Required prior knowledge: C1T4L5. Classification: domestic. Revision: 2026-10-26. All fictional names, prices, rates, fees, calendars and tax schedules below are hypothetical unless explicitly identified as a dated document observation.

“Protected” and “guaranteed” require different evidence. A strategy that aims to preserve capital depends on its investments and implementation. A guarantee adds an identified provider's obligation under stated conditions. Neither label establishes that an investor can sell at the purchase amount on every date. Read covered units, amount, currency, participation conditions, scheduled dates and early-exit treatment before discussing return.

Mechanics

A protected fund can combine a capital-preservation asset allocation with upside participation, while seeking rather than unconditionally promising the target. A guaranteed fund's documents identify a guarantor and its shortfall obligation. The precise legal terms govern; the simplified structure below is hypothetical. An investor who buys after the protected entry window or exits early may have different rights.

Cash needed includes the initial investment and any entry charge. Upside can depend on an observation formula, caps, averaging or participation rate. In an ordinary fully paid long unit position without additional commitment, purchase-value loss can reach cash invested plus investor charges; protection language narrows that risk only to the extent its conditions and provider actually support it.

Price and return drivers

For a fictional scheduled-maturity teaching structure, target payment = principal × [1 + participation × max(index return, 0)]. Here principal is TRY 100,000 and participation 50%, with no cap, fees or tax in the payoff formula. The stated floor is a target for the protected variant. For the guaranteed variant, an invented solvent guarantor pays the portfolio shortfall on the scheduled date for eligible units. The formula describes maturity rights; pre-maturity value depends on discount rates, option value, credit and exit costs.

Worked case

Assume eligible initial units held to a one-year scheduled maturity. The hypothetical structure uses index price return, no dividends, one final observation and 50% participation.

Index outcomeFormula targetReturn on principal before investor charges
−30%TRY 100,0000%
0%TRY 100,0000%
+40%TRY 120,00020%

If an entry fee of TRY 1,000 is paid separately and the target is achieved, a flat-index outcome returns TRY 100,000 against TRY 101,000 total outlay: −0.9901% before tax. “100% principal” can therefore coexist with a negative investor result. These invented terms are not a currently offered Turkish fund.

Adverse case

Three separate stress paths matter. First, the protected strategy finishes with only TRY 92,000 despite a TRY 100,000 target: without a guarantee, the target itself does not supply the TRY 8,000 shortfall. Second, in the fictional guaranteed variant a solvent guarantor supplies that TRY 8,000 only if the conditions apply; if the provider defaults and recovery is only half of its owed shortfall, total received is TRY 96,000. Third, an early-sale quote of TRY 90,000 six months before maturity, less a TRY 500 exit charge, yields TRY 89,500. This is a pre-maturity sale value, not a contradiction of a conditional maturity formula. Do not combine all three paths into one promised outcome.

Practical use

Check availability and access for the exact domestic issue; the existence of a regulatory category does not prove a live series is offered. Obtain effective fund documents and the guarantee agreement where relevant. Verify subscription window, observation calendar, redemption restrictions, provider credit and claim process. Include entry/exit charges, embedded expenses, spreads and tax. Actual taxation requires year, investor residence/status, acquisition date and effective rule; this lesson applies no actual tax schedule. A maturity-target table is not an executable early-sale quote.

Decision boundaries

These structures can fit a matching horizon and a precisely acceptable conditional risk profile. They fail a flexible liquidity need if early exit is uncertain or costly. Decline when the maturity date falls after the required spending date, the protected currency differs from the liability, or the provider/conditions are missing. Inflation can reduce purchasing power even when nominal principal is returned. A guaranteed label does not make the provider's own default impossible.

Practice and references

Exercise: hypothetical eligible principal TRY 60,000, 40% participation in positive final index price return, separate entry fee TRY 600. Show maturity targets at −20%, 0% and +25%. Answer: TRY 60,000, TRY 60,000 and TRY 66,000. On total outlay TRY 60,600, investor returns are −0.9901%, −0.9901% and +8.9109%, before tax and assuming targets are achieved. A pre-maturity offer of TRY 55,000 must be assessed as a distinct exit price, not replaced by the maturity floor.

Takeaway: protection has an amount, a date, conditions and possibly a separate provider.

Reference guide: protected-fund; guaranteed-fund; protected-payoff; protection-date; guarantor; participation-rate. Next: C1T5L1. Topic test.

Sources: SPK Mutual Funds Introduction Guide — What is a fund; fund expenses; fund types; founder and manager; recorded units; date not stated; retrieved 2026-10-26; checked 2026-10-26; SPK Communique III-52.1 — Articles 3–6, 14–15, 24–27; Annexes 2–3; date 2013-07-09; consolidated text lists amendments through 2024-03-01; checked 2026-10-26. Source records: sources.json. Check the cited rule dates and confirm current dealing terms before any transaction.

Shared reference guide | Class examination